Rixot: automated sourcing, manual approval
Rixot, at rixot.com, automates the slow part of link building: finding relevant, real-traffic domains from more than 50,000 vetted sites and drafting the placement article. You still approve each one before it goes live, usually within about 24 hours, at a price starting from $1 per link.
An assistant brand built around directness still needs the same unglamorous visibility work as any other site. Rixot removes the manual search-and-outreach part of that work without removing your say over what goes live.
Related tools
On this page
Sourcing at a scale manual outreach can't match
Manually finding sites worth a placement means checking traffic, relevance and contact details one at a time. Rixot's AI does that sourcing from a pool of more than 50,000 vetted sites, filtering for domains it judges relevant to your target page before you ever see a proposal, which is the part of the job that otherwise eats most of a week.
The article is drafted for you
Rixot also writes the placement article itself, rather than leaving that step to you or a freelancer. What you review is a finished draft on a specific domain, not a blank brief you still have to fill in, which turns the review into an edit pass instead of a writing assignment.
You approve every single one
Nothing goes live without your approval, placement by placement, which keeps a human decision over which domains actually carry your link. Once approved, it typically goes live in about 24 hours, fast enough that a batch of approvals on a Monday is visible by midweek.
How it plugs into a workflow
A REST API, an MCP agent usable from ChatGPT or Claude, or a plain dashboard are all available, so link building can sit inside an existing content or growth pipeline instead of running as a separate manual chore someone has to remember to do.
The limits worth stating plainly
Pricing is per link, from $1, with no flat package. No ranking result is guaranteed, nothing is marketed as safe or penalty-proof, and no traffic figure is published for any specific placement. Automating the search and the draft does not automate the outcome.
Directness in the placement article too
A brand built on giving direct answers is a poor fit for a placement article stuffed with vague marketing language, even if the domain hosting it has real traffic. Since Rixot drafts the article and you review it before approval, that review is the moment to check the draft reads like something your own brand would publish, not generic filler written to satisfy a link requirement. Rejecting a placement over weak writing costs nothing beyond the time to look, and keeps the automation's speed from working against the brand's own voice.